Thursday, May 30, 2019

Jack The Ripper Essay -- Papers

Jack The Ripper 1. From looking at the newspaper article on source A, I discharge determine the following information regarding the mar of Polly Nichols. Firstly, I can ascertain that it was the second of the Whitechapel murders. I can draw this conclusion from the first few words the two murders which cast off so shock London. The second point we can learn from this article is that the killer had no app bent motive for the killings, supposedly because gold wasnt missing from his victims no adequate motive in the shape of plunder can be traced. Also, the article tells us that the victims have been the poorest of the poor Even though these pieces of information are product of the media, they appear to be true, as there would be no need for the newspaper to sensationalise such facts. The source also suggests the killer is a demented being, referable to the extraordinary violence exhibited in each of his murders. Finally, the source makes telephone extension to the excess of effort used by the killer 2. The report of Dr. Frederick Blackwell on the body of Elizabeth Stride supports the coroners report on source B when it states that in the neck, there was a long tool which commenced on the left side, two and a half inches below the jaw, cutting the windpipe completely in two. This mark supports source B which states there are no meaningless cuts and that the injuries have been made by someone with consider equal anatomical skill obviously because the killer knew where to reach the windpipe. The pull in also supports source A where it negotiation about the extraordinary violence. However, source C contradicts source A when ... ... that a disgruntled customer of one of the local Jewish craftsmens shops may have just create verbally this graffiti to express his anger. The only thing linking this graffiti to the Eddowes murder was a tiny piece of Eddowess apron make nearby. Source A mentions the victims being the poorest of the poor. This is important, as maybe the police werent worried as much about the poor people. Also this suggests that the killings may have been in hard to reach places for the police. Source B mentions the anatomical skill and subsistledge required to carry out such murders. Maybe such a man could also have enough knowledge to be able to out wit the police. Source F, the leaflet is another reminder of the police effort to stop the Ripper getting away, precisely it could also have let the Ripper know of the police involvement too much. Jack The Ripper Essay -- Papers Jack The Ripper 1. From looking at the newspaper article on source A, I can determine the following information regarding the murder of Polly Nichols. Firstly, I can ascertain that it was the second of the Whitechapel murders. I can draw this conclusion from the first few words the two murders which have so startled London. The second point we can learn from this article is that the killer had no apparent motive for the killings, supposedly because money wasnt missing from his victims no adequate motive in the shape of plunder can be traced. Also, the article tells us that the victims have been the poorest of the poor Even though these pieces of information are product of the media, they appear to be true, as there would be no need for the newspaper to sensationalise such facts. The source also suggests the killer is a demented being, due to the extraordinary violence exhibited in each of his murders. Finally, the source makes reference to the excess of effort used by the killer 2. The report of Dr. Frederick Blackwell on the body of Elizabeth Stride supports the coroners report on source B when it states that in the neck, there was a long incision which commenced on the left side, two and a half inches below the jaw, cutting the windpipe completely in two. This account supports source B which s tates there are no meaningless cuts and that the injuries have been made by someone with considerable anatomical skill obviously because the killer knew where to reach the windpipe. The extract also supports source A where it talks about the extraordinary violence. However, source C contradicts source A when ... ... that a disgruntled customer of one of the local Jewish craftsmens shops may have just written this graffiti to express his anger. The only thing linking this graffiti to the Eddowes murder was a tiny piece of Eddowess apron found nearby. Source A mentions the victims being the poorest of the poor. This is important, as maybe the police werent worried as much about the poor people. Also this suggests that the killings may have been in hard to reach places for the police. Source B mentions the anatomical skill and knowledge required to carry out such murders. Maybe such a man could also have enough knowledge to be able to out wit the police. Source F, the leaflet is another reminder of the police effort to stop the Ripper getting away, but it could also have let the Ripper know of the police involvement too much.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.